This is a static copy of the main site, preserved for historical purposes only. Please see this page for more information.


InfoInfo TalkTalk

Every person on your wiki can deal with abuse by, well, just fixing or removing it! This solution works almost always, and you should "let the wiki clean itself." This is good for your wiki and good for your community.

More extreme cases can be dealt with by a wiki admin — who can lock pages by changing the security settings, permanently revert and delete pages, and ban users. Wiki admins run a wiki, and are the people in charge.

This page is for the super-extreme abuse and the things you can't otherwise do anything about. Notice a wiki created for the purpose of spamming? You can't delete a wiki, so that would be a good thing to note here. An automated spamming bot? Report such wide-scale abuses here. Please do not report things which you, as a community, or as a wiki admin, can reasonably deal with yourself.

Alternative abuse contact: email <philipn AT gmail DOT com> for now.

List accounts used to spam over at Accounts used to spam. Please list one wiki per line. This makes it easier to clean up.

Potential community guidelines misunderstandings (not urgent, just to keep track):

Commercial gain

I give a notice kinda like this:

Note: This wiki appears to conflict with the [wikispot]Community Guidelines of the Wiki Spot project. Namely, it appears to be established for commercial gain. If there's a misunderstanding, please comment on the [wikispot]guidelines discussion page.

Keep in mind that JabberWokky does not add to this list, he just zots and moves on, so searing for the keyword will locate well over a hundred of such wikis.

Commercial Gain beyond editor intervention

Okay, here's where the annoying ones reside. No editing allowed, clear cut commercial motive:

Add here

Abuse sites beyond editor intervention

Search Engine Spamming

I've wiped the content of a couple wikis now. They were creating pages that were sales pitches and links to another website. I gave a notice that contains much more content than the above, as it replaces their front page rather than simply being prepended to it:

This wiki appears to have been built with the sole purpose of search engine spam
and has had the content be removed.

This was an action taken by a fellow editor, just like you, so if it is incorrect, please let the [wikispot]Interwiki Community know so that your wiki does not keep getting wiped out. You might want to make it more clear how your wiki fits into the [wikispot]Community Guidelines.
Content removed by [wikispot]Evan 'JabberWokky' Edwards, feel free to ask why, and I apologize if I mistook your intent!

I also included a ## wiki comment that used the three parts, "wiki", then "spam", then "seo" as one single phrase. If you wipe a wiki, use it and we can track all the notices by doing an interwiki search for the term. I signed the wipe in case a future one is a mistake — so they don't see it as some kind of automated, faceless, implacable system notice. I've run into that in the past (even just editor A using bold can make editor B think it was some kind of unappealable system stamp), and keeping real, approachable people in the loop seems like a good idea. Note that these should be swept through and deleted when Abuse is cleared out

There are several more, tagged with the search term above.

Most of these seem awfully similar — a paragraph about the same length, with a different link each time.

Notice given

Wait & See / Discuss

[feedoor]feedoor might conflict with "Do not create a wiki for commercial gain," but we should wait a bit because it's too new to tell if it is on the "community run" side of the line. [meds]meds could easily be legit (but as a popular topic for spammers is a good idea to keep an eye on).

[rtea]rtea (a title company? or is it general stuff?)

No intended community


Wikis that were meant to be pages on some wiki.


The account Famke appears to be running a phishing scam — or possibly just seo spam — on Runescape players connected to some service called "rs2" and then "".

Wiki Spot Spam

Sometimes it's hard to tell when somebody creates a Wiki Spot entry if it is leading to a wiki or if it's just a simple spam entry. I use the following (note the link to Cleanup):

''This entry appeared to be '''commercial spam''' and has been removed.  If it was not spam (see the ["community guidelines"]), it was removed through an honest misunderstanding, and you are encouraged to restore it (and possibly rewrite it or add to it to make it clear how it fits here at Wiki Spot)["Cleanup" .]''

Personal Websites


Note: You must be logged in to add comments

IPs that have been seen spamming:

2007-05-31 07:47:40   [WWW] looks like it's just some guy —ArlenAbraham

2007-07-21 15:25:13   business creating a wiki for itself that is un-editable. There are several problems presented by this case including that the chosen wikispot prefix is a namespace collision. This is not the first time that it appears that a business has set up a wikispot just for their business, but the other examples didn't lock out editing and it was possible to suggest moving their listing to a local wiki. —JasonAller

The following is a proposition coming about from the recent activity of Steven Ostrowski and his administration of the [redding]Redding Wiki. Whereas a "wiki" is an interlinked set of Web pages written by the people who use it. The beauty of a wiki being that anyone can edit and contribute. The Wiki Spot is a nonprofit, member-supported organization dedicated to helping communities use their wikis.
Whereas it is against community guidelines, and hence often considered abuse, to create a wiki with no intended community, ergo using this software as a web log or for personal vanity.
Whereas it is against community guidelines, and hence should be considered abuse, to create a wiki with the express purpose of being malicious to a person, place, or object.
Whereas the Redding Wiki Administrator had issued bans for WikiSpot users BrentLaabs, WilliamLewis, and JamesSchwab upon creation of the wiki exclusively excluding them from the community.
Whereas the Redding Wiki Administrator had issued bans for a user without warning or justification in accordance to the [redding]Redding Wiki Regulations, or apparent abuse of generally accepted policy (as above).
Whereas it contradicts community guidelines to create a wiki with the same intended purpose.
Whereas the statement of the Redding Wiki is as a center for community contributed information, opinions, announcements, and everything else about Redding and the surrounding region.
Whereas it is also stated throughout the wiki that "Anyone may edit this site", with the only qualifications to this principle being the aforementioned community guidelines.
Thus, members of the community who do not wish to violate the guidelines of the wikispot organization, they are unable to act towards the intended purpose of a city wiki for Redding, Ca.
Whereas exclusive members of the community have been disallowed from this community without just cause, and therefore prevented access to information maliciously.
As such, the Redding Wiki, and its administrator have demonstrated an abuse of the wikispot community. The unreasonable action has created an unreasonable situation whereby people whom wish to support free information for this geographic region may not without justifiable cause. As such, I propose a change in administration of this site to an individual, or some means of forcible conflict resolution. I do not mean to propose that wikispot forces a change in policy on the wiki, nor do I mean that it should act against closed groups. I however do feel that it would be a bad precedent to allow for this abuse whereby one can simply create a group which excludes members of the community without due course of some policy or law. Though one may set up a policy of zero tolerance for defined abuses of behavior, limiting an exclusive group of individuals from even participating in the community is akin to the former racial segregation of the educational system. This is clearly abuse of the principles of community, a contradiction of the spirit of wikispot, and a violation of the principles of the Redding Wiki. I believe we must set the precedent that the wikis are not created for the privilege of their creators, but for the whole of their community. As such I propose that Steven Ostrowski lose the administrative control of the Redding wiki, and that this be handed to a member of the geographic location. As there are no such users, I propose that in the interim that such control either be left to Philip Neustrom, Jason Aller, and/or myself, so that the community may hopefully grow until such a time that there is a majority quorum of users from or in that geographic locale.
~Reverend David Alonzo Poole III.

2007-09-17 16:27:14   Haha, apparently Steve Ostrowski has also banned me from reading/editing his wiki. Keep in mind that I haven't violated any of his wiki's regulations, and even "defended" him on his own wiki. "Let him have his empire" is pretty much all I put on his wiki. Just yesterday I had a thought to contribute to it by creating a page for Lassen Volcanic National Park, but now it seems I cannot do that. Awww... and I had so many pretty pictures I was willing to release under creative commons... Guess not!

Note: I have not banned SteveOstrowski from either the [dnawiki]dnawiki or the [madison]madison, nor do I plan to unless he becomes destructive and is uncontrollable. Even after this slight, I don't plan on it. I'm confident that he has no particular desire (or expertise) to edit anything on my wikis, and I'm not so wrapped up in personal vendettas to make my wikis an extension of my lack of positive attention while growing up.

Like I said on the Redding Wiki, let him have his empire. See it fizzle out as no one desires to contribute to it. The wiki community is not made welcome at the [redding]Redding Wiki so leave it alone. We have more important things to do with our time, and each attempt to circumvent his personal vendetta bans only gives him the attention he craves. Don't edit the Redding Wiki.KarlMogel

2008-02-20 09:44:45   No no, Petroleum monkey is just a game group. just for fun, but ive had skool lately havnt been able to update much so as soon as i can i'll update i'll be in a few days to update it.. sorry if theres been some sort of communtiy thing —

2008-04-16 01:37:44   Banned yangandjiao from the hub for spamming. —WilliamLewis

2008-06-09 15:02:55   I've started a weekly interwiki scan for drugrehab and alcoholabuse, which appear in URLs that are being spammed by various throwaway accounts across Wiki Spot. They are only ever semitopical, and seem to be an attempt to create a high number of links into the sites, which are skeleton sites with not much info. Presumably it is occurring elsewhere and the sites will be flipped to a scam of some sort or another in the future. (Incidentally, there is one wiki entry that matches those terms that is legit, should somebody else start doing this as well). —JabberWokky

2008-09-26 11:46:27   cardollar at isp: spammed my front page and it looks like quite a few others were spammed as well. —amycsj

WideCircles (dot com) is an example of a nasty new subtle effort at spamming wikis and social networking sites. It looks like they fired off a test salvo from under the username lauren. Buy a hat — it looks like the spammers see subtlety as their next "trick". —Evan 'JabberWokky' Edwards — Edited to remove the link so they do not benefit from this page like the many pages they have spammed.

2008-11-25 04:02:17 is a Ukraine IP that is spamming across Wiki Spot. Also posted one [WWW]actual positive edit. —JabberWokky

2008-11-25 04:07:45   I just submitted a feature request to be able to see all the anonymous edits that have come from a certain IP address. Probably useful for catching spam. —WilliamLewis

2009-04-09 03:03:43   [chico]Automated spam?JabberWokky

2010-02-05 09:18:00   We have a spammer posting things ads for US businesses from an address quite frequently. Do you think we should contact these businesses and tell them about the unethical spammer they hired to do promotion? Accounts used:

Suspected associated accounts:


2011-06-29 15:31:29   === List of new spam or s.e.o. sites to be removed from server (since 5/17/2011) === (Most spam content already deleted/reverted.)

2011-08-03 03:06:05   === Another batch of new spam/s.e.o. sites to be removed. === (Most spam content already deleted/reverted.)
There is at least one created everyday...

2011-08-11 09:23:30   I don't usually bother posting spammers, but this one's a repeat: [WWW]

2011-08-13 01:14:23   === More spam/s.e.o. sites to be removed. === (Most spam content already deleted/reverted.)


2011-12-14 09:03:02   === Spam/s.e.o. sites to be removed. ===


S.e.o. spamming sites to be removed (728)

2013-01-06 18:03:00  

This is a Wiki Spot wiki. Wiki Spot is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization that helps communities collaborate via wikis.